“There is no ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any on the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din noticed firstly the deceased and after far they observed the petitioners going towards the same direction, did not signify that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. These evidence cannot be treated as evidence of final found.
93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming on the main case, It is usually a nicely-set up proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is topic for the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and consist of all notable cases decided from the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are not binding, but may very well be used as persuasive authority, which is to give here substance to your party’s argument, or to guide the present court.
long period petitioner wasn't regarded as for promotion, meeting on the departmental promotion committee and look at the petitioner (Promotion)
In this weblog post, we will delve into the details of Section 302 PPC, exploring its provisions and also the gravity of its punishment.
148 . Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Presented the legal analysis on the topic issue, we have been with the view that the claim in the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle isn't legally sound, In addition to promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They're topic to rules and regulations When the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case on the petitioners for promotion might be thought of, however, we are clear inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be thought of for seniority and promotion given that the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health, matter to availability of vacancy subject into the approval on the competent authority. Read more
This guide supplies valuable insights into free online resources offering access to Pakistani case law, helping you navigate the complexities of legal research.
Typically, only an appeal accepted through the court of last resort will resolve this kind of differences and, for many reasons, such appeals tend to be not granted.
When the petitioner is actually present at the place of occurrence without causing any injury towards the deceased or PWs then in this sort of circumstances, whether he is vicariously liable shall be decided by the learned trial Court after recording of your evidence.
Legal Defenses: An accused person charged under Section 302 PPC can present legal defenses like self-defense, insanity, or accidental killing, which might lead to reduced charges or acquittal.
Generally speaking, higher courts never have direct oversight over the reduced courts of record, in that they cannot arrive at out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments of your lower courts.
share or interest of the co-owner in immovable property may sold to another co-owner/co-sharer or simply to an stranger and section 44(Transfer of Property Act 1882)
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a 12-year aged boy from his home to protect him from the Awful physical and sexual abuse he had experienced in his home, and also to prevent him from abusing other children within the home. The boy was placed within an unexpected emergency foster home, and was later shifted about within the foster care system.